Unveiling Systematic Risks: PCA Analysis to High-Frequency and Low-Frequency Factor Data Open Access

Zirui Song (Fall 2024)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/9593tw47d?locale=f
Published

Abstract

Systematic risks have long been analyzed through factor models. This paper applies quadratic Principal Component Analysis (PCA), as proposed by Pelger (2019), to extract stable systematic risk factors from high-frequency data and compares them with factors identified from low-frequency data. The findings suggest that industry factors like technology, financials, energy, and industrials consistently dominate the explained variance, highlighting their central role in systematic risk. While for the low-frequency data, accounting-related factors emerge as the primary drivers of variance. However, during portfolio optimization, the factors with the highest optimized weights are notably different from the factors in the leading principal components. These weights are more firm-specific and diversified across various categories, emphasizing the importance of idiosyncratic drivers in practical investment strategies. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the divergence between systematic risk decomposition and optimized portfolio construction, offering valuable insights for risk management and investment strategies. It underscores the importance of integrating firm-specific factors with broader systematic components to enhance portfolio performance and suggests future research directions in dynamic modeling and event-driven analysis.

Table of Contents

Section 1: Introduction                                                                                                  1

Section 2: Methodology                                                                                                 3

2.1 PCA Overview                                                                                                              3

2.2 Comparison between Factors                                                                                   4

2.3 Mean-Variance Portfolio Optimization                                                                  5

Section 3: Dataset                                                                                                           6

Section 4: Empirical Results                                                                                         7

4.1 Latent Factor Estimation                                                                                           7

4.2 State-varying Factors                                                                                                15

4.3 Portfolio Optimization                                                                                              20

Section 5: Conclusion                                                                                                    26

Section 6: Further Discussion                                                                                     27

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files