The Choice to Ride: How Station Environments Shape Behavior in U.S. Heavy Rail Systems Open Access

Blechman, Jake (Spring 2026)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/8c97ks03f?locale=en
Published

Abstract

Across the United States, heavy rail ridership has collapsed in the post-pandemic era, even in cities that have poured billions into new trains, renovated stations, and expanded service. Why?

This study argues that perception, shaped by the social, physical, and informational environments in and around transit stations, is an independent and deeply underacknowledged driver of ridership behavior. Using a vignette-based survey of nearly 2,000 respondents across major U.S. combined statistical areas, this study isolates how specific station and system-level cues alter individuals' stated willingness to wait for and ride on heavy rail transit. 

The results are striking: environment shapes behavior. Physical cues such as visible disorder and poor lighting, social cues such as crowd density and the presence of law enforcement or individuals experiencing homelessness, and information cues such as exposure to positive and negative transit-related news and word-of-mouth narratives all recorded significant effects on stated willingness to wait in a given station. While demographic factors like gender, age, and political ideology produced baseline variation, environmental cues drove broadly consistent effects across groups. 

The implications are clear: investment in station environments and safety messaging may be as or more consequential to ridership recovery as any operational improvements ever could be.

Table of Contents

Introduction 1

Literature Review 3

Theoretical Argument 11

Hypotheses 13

H1. 13

H2. 13

H3. 14

H4. 14

H5. 15

Research Design 15

Definitions 17

Heavy Rail Transit 17

Physical Environment 18

Social Environment 18

Information Environment 20

Sampling Strategy & Respondent Recruitment 21

Survey Instrument Structure 22

Experimental Design 23

Identification Strategy and Analytical Approach 25

Limitations and Ethical Considerations 27

Sample 28

Results 31

Demographic Categories 50

Political Ideology 53

Age 56

Education 59

Income 61

Gender 63

Race/Ethnicity 66

Combined Statistical Area 69

Behavioral Categories 71

Lifetime Ridership Behavior 73

Use Frequency 76

Proximity to Transit 78

Car Ownership 80

Profile Predictions 83

Conclusion 85

About this Honors Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files