Racial Discrimination in Family Planning Settings: Measurement, Care Quality, and Autonomy in the U.S. South Restricted; Files Only

Luke, Alina (Spring 2026)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/6m311q94p?locale=en
Published

Abstract

In reproductive healthcare, discriminatory experiences reduce an individual's ability to achieve reproductive autonomy. Understanding how discrimination operates in these settings and its relationship to health and healthcare outcomes is essential. Research shows that providers demonstrate bias in their interactions with patients and that people of color receive lower-quality care than their white peers. This dissertation seeks to validate a measure of discrimination in family planning settings and examine the relationship between racial discrimination in these settings and person-centered contraceptive care and contraceptive autonomy. I utilized Levesque's patient-centered access to care framework as well as a reproductive justice lens to guide the study design, analysis, and interpretation.

Data for the first study came from the nationally representative Person-Centered Contraceptive Access Metrics Survey (n=3,059). I performed exploratory factor analysis and tested reliability and known-groups validity. I identified two factors (general and stereotype-based discrimination) and retained seven scale items. The measure demonstrated strong reliability (coefficient omega 0.97) and goodness-of-fit (TLI=0.988, RMSEA=0.066).

The second and third studies used cross-sectional data from a sample of people of color in the U.S. South who may become pregnant and sought family planning services in the past year (n=335). Aim 2 assessed the relationship between lifetime racial discrimination in family planning settings and person-centered contraceptive counseling (PCCC). Over two-thirds of respondents reported at least one type of discrimination, which was associated with receiving person-centered contraceptive counseling, with each one-unit increase in mean discrimination score associated with 74% lower adjusted odds of excellent PCCC. In Aim 3, I examined the relationship between the discrimination measure and use of preferred contraceptive method and satisfaction with one's current method. For each one-unit increase in mean discrimination score, use of preferred method had 51% lower odds, and higher method satisfaction had 35% lower odds.

Lifetime experiences of racial discrimination in family planning settings are common, especially among people of color in the U.S. South. These experiences are consequential and strongly tied to the quality of family planning care and to the enactment of contraceptive autonomy. Multilevel intervention is called for, including trauma-informed care approaches, structural competency, and institutional and governmental policy changes.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Introduction 1

Introduction 1

Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks 3

Discrimination in Healthcare Settings 14

Measurement of Discrimination in Family Planning Settings 24

The U.S. South Context 28

Person-Centered Contraceptive Care 37

Contraceptive Autonomy 41

Gaps in the Literature 45

Dissertation Overview and Aims 47

References 50

Chapter 2. Experiences of Discrimination in Reproductive Healthcare: A Psychometric Evaluation of a Discrimination Measure for Family Planning Settings 66

Abstract 66

Background 68

Methods 73

Results 78

Discussion 88

Conclusions 96

References 97

Appendix 102

Chapter 3. Lifetime Experiences of Racial Discrimination and Person-Centered Contraceptive Care in Family Planning Settings in the U.S. South 104

Abstract 104

Introduction 106

Methods 110

Results 115

Discussion 125

References 132

Appendix 138

Chapter 4. Lifetime Experiences of Racial Discrimination and Contraceptive Autonomy Outcomes Among People of Color in the U.S. South 139

Abstract 139

Introduction 141

Methods 144

Results 150

Discussion 158

References 165

Appendix 169

Chapter 5: Conclusion 170

Introduction 170

Summary of Findings 170

Strengths and Limitations 172

Implications and Future Directions 176

Conclusion 183

References 185

About this Dissertation

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified Preview image embargoed

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files