Stepwise Screening for Asymptomatic Diabetes Using Opportunistically Available Random Plasma Glucose and HbA1c Open Access
Legvold, Brian (Spring 2020)
Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) are inconvenient but sensitive for identifying diabetes (DM), whereas more convenient HbA1c tests may be inaccurate.
We asked if an alternative two-step strategy, measuring HbA1c only if opportunistically available random plasma glucose (RPG) is ≥100 mg/dl, could improve screening.
The Screening for Impaired Glucose Tolerance (SIGT) dataset, where 1,573 adults without known DM had measurements of RPG, HbA1c, and OGTTs; was used to evaluate the two-step strategy, using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis adjusted for optimism to identify DM per American Diabetes Association (ADA) OGTT criteria.
Participants were 58% female and 58% black, with mean age 47.9 years, BMI 30.3 kg/m2 and HbA1c 5.4%; 4.6% had DM by ADA OGTT criteria. The ROC area under the curve was 0.82 for HbA1c to identify DM among all 1,573 participants, but 0.86 in those with RPG ≥100 mg/dl (n=576), vs. 0.58 in those with RPG <100 mg/dl (n=997) (modeled interaction p<0.001). DM participants with RPG ≥100 vs <100 mg/dl had mean fasting plasma glucose 131 vs. 116 mg/dl and 2-hour plasma glucose 225 vs. 183 mg/dl, and HbA1c 6.4% vs. 5.6%, respectively, (all p<0.025) – less severe disease in those with RPG <100 mg/dl. Limiting OGTTs to those with RPG ≥100 mg/dl and HbA1c ≥5.5% would provide 74% sensitivity and 82% specificity overall and reduce the number of OGTTs needed by 80%. The participants with unrecognized DM who were not identified by this method (n=19) had a mean HbA1c of 5.5% (±0.6%), a fasting glucose of 115 mg/dl (±19.4 mg/dl) and an 2hr OGTT of 195 mg/dl (±56.3 mg/dl).
Use of RPG followed by HbA1c improves the accuracy and efficiency of screening, identifying both individuals who should and should not have an OGTT. Such a strategy might improve recognition of diabetes and prediabetes, permitting initiation of preventive management.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Research Design and Methods
Receiver Operating Characteristics
Table 1 Participant demographics
Table 2 Screening accuracy of reduced model by HbA1c cut point
Table 3 Screening accuracy by HbA1c cut point, relative to complete study population
Figure 1 Random Plasma Glucose versus HbA1c, by Dysglycemia
Figure 2 Distribution of HbA1c by RPG ≥100 mg/dl and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
About this Master's Thesis
|Subfield / Discipline|
|Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor|
|Stepwise Screening for Asymptomatic Diabetes Using Opportunistically Available Random Plasma Glucose and HbA1c ()||2020-04-28 13:58:38 -0400||