Ethically Including Individuals Who Are Incarcerated in Clinical Research: A Cross-Sectional Survey Exploring the Perspectives of Cardiovascular Researchers Open Access

Urban, Dana (Fall 2019)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/3r074w03g?locale=pt-BR%2A
Published

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, disproportionately affects individuals in jails and prisons. Incarceration and cardiovascular disease share many of the same risk factors, and both affect minority groups at higher rates than the general population. Federal and ethical guidelines designed to protect vulnerable populations often inadvertently exclude individuals who are incarcerated in clinical research. This leads to underrepresentation of key subsets of the population in study results, including individuals who are incarcerated. Clinical research is important to accurately identify and find solutions to reduce health disparities.

Objective: To explore the barriers to including incarcerated individuals in clinical research studies by investigating cardiovascular researchers’ attitudes and experiences, and to determine whether additional resources targeting researchers could assist in overcoming these barriers.

Methods: A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted to look at the current practices and attitudes on this topic among cardiovascular researchers. Cardiovascular researchers from the Heart Failure Clinical Research Network were recruited via email to participate in the study. Data were analyzed using SAS.

Results: Fifty-six cardiovascular researchers completed the survey, for a response rate of 34.4%. Most researchers (89.3%) were unfamiliar with protocols to retain subjects who become incarcerated while enrolled in their research studies. While 17.9% of respondents were aware of a subject’s incarceration during a study, only two (3.6%) had worked on a study that discussed subsequent incarceration in the protocol or consent. The majority (55.4%) felt it would be valuable to be more familiar with this process, and most (71.4%) were willing to use resources to facilitate this in future studies.

Conclusion: There is demonstrated interest and perceived value among cardiovascular researchers in the development of resources to assist in ethically including individuals who are incarcerated in studies. By increasing representation of underserved groups in research, we can gain a greater understanding of health disparities, and ultimately find ways to improve overall health outcomes.

Table of Contents

I.        CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION     1

           A.  CONTEXT, PROBLEM, AND PURPOSE     1

           B.  RESEARCH QUESTIONS     3

           C.  DEFINITIONS OF TERMS     6

II.       CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW     9

           A.  CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN THE UNITED STATES     9

           B.  INCARCERATION IN THE UNITED STATES     11

           C.  HEALTH OF CORRECTIONAL POPULATIONS     19

           D.  CVD BURDEN IN CORRECTIONAL POPULATIONS     21

           E.  DATA ON THE HEALTH OF INCARCERATED PERSONS     23

           F.  FEDERAL AND ETHICAL GUIDELINES     25

           G.  IDENTIFYING HEALTH DISPARITIES     26

III.     CHAPTER 3: MANUSCRIPT     28

           A.  ABSTRACT     30

           B.  INTRODUCTION     31

           C.  METHODS     33

           D.  RESULTS     37

           E.  DISCUSSION     39

           F.  CONCLUSION     42

           G.  TABLES     43

IV.     CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSION     48

           A.  RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS     48

           B.  CONCLUSION     49

V.       APPENDICES     50

           A.  CONSENT FORM     50

           B.  SURVEY INSTRUMENT     52

           C.  RECRUITMENT EMAIL     55

VI.      REFERENCES     56

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Committee Members
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files