Examining COVID-19 vaccine intention and receipt through the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior Open Access

Miller, Lauren (Spring 2023)

Permanent URL: https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/2b88qd52j?locale=f
Published

Abstract

Background. Few studies have used health behavioral theories to understand both COVID-19 vaccine intention and receipt. We used data from a longitudinal population-based survey to understand how the theoretical variables from the Health Belief Model (HBM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) are associated with vaccine intention and vaccine receipt.

 

Methods. Participants with responses for the 3-month survey in which health beliefs were assessed, and who reported their COVID-19 vaccination status at follow-up (6- and/or 18-months) were included in this study. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between HBM and TPB variables with vaccine intention and vaccine receipt. Phi coefficient, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were used to compare vaccine intention to vaccine receipt.

 

Results. Among the 661 participants in the sample, 82% (543) intended to receive the COVID-19 vaccine while 90% (592) had received the vaccine at follow-up. The theoretical predictors were observed to be similar for vaccine intention and receipt in the univariable analysis, while they differed in the multivariable analysis. Perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, and positive attitude were associated with vaccine intention. Perceived benefits, employer mandated vaccination, subjective norm, and positive attitude were associated with vaccine receipt.

 

Conclusions. There is relatively little overlap between theoretical variables predicting vaccine intention and vaccine receipt. Most studies have only investigated vaccine intention, which is unlikely to produce results that will adequately inform public health action. External factors are more likely to impact vaccine receipt, including workplace vaccine mandates and factors influencing subjective norms.

Table of Contents

Introduction, 1-2

Methods, 3-5

Results, 5-10

Discussion, 11-12

Conclusion, 13

References, 14-15

Supplementary Materials, 16-19

About this Master's Thesis

Rights statement
  • Permission granted by the author to include this thesis or dissertation in this repository. All rights reserved by the author. Please contact the author for information regarding the reproduction and use of this thesis or dissertation.
School
Department
Subfield / Discipline
Degree
Submission
Language
  • English
Research Field
Keyword
Committee Chair / Thesis Advisor
Last modified

Primary PDF

Supplemental Files